Iwar

Trash Polka?

99 posts in this topic

I personally don't care for this style of tattooing, but I'm curious to hear what the rest of you think. To my untrained eye it looks like it's applied decently enough, but I suspect the "no outline" thing won't age with dignity...

tumblr_lngdm7aWw51qzoi9jo1_400.jpg

173724d1296913814-habt-ihr-ein-tattoo-taetowierung-safe_image.php-d-56b90eb0d51e10b0bd7ae3bcb196251e-url-http-3a-2f-2fc4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com-2.jpg

8532_0original.jpg

l.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, on a canvas it would look better, but as a tattoo meh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Volker does have some good stuff. Or this one I REALLY like. Infact, I liked just this one really :P

08.jpg

Btw. If I remember correctly, the trash polka tattoos are a collabarative effort between Volker and Simone Pfaff.

edit. collabarative? collaborative

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I wouldn't care to have any of those tattoos or own any of that art as paintings either.

bongsau and Kev like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not my style...I would worry about aging.

That said, I like the first 2 pics...but I wouldn't want either actually on my body.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its beautifully applied but feels very faddy and trendy . kinda like tribal lol does that make sense ? its not very sincere to me its clinical. Math does a similar style but nicer imo Tattoo work : EVENMOREBLACK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They look like shitty t shirt designs except someone forgot the shirt part!

I know some of you like the artwork but I just don't. To me it's nothing new, nothing interesting, nothing that should be tattooed. The back pieces to me just look fucking stupid and are going to look way stupider in 5-10 years when they turn into black blobs (first one already is black blobs ha!). The second back piece, I can't imagine how the white and pink will last more than 1-2 years. I'd be scared to get that much red in a tattoo without outlines.

gougetheeyes likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just comes off as being a bit TOO derivative of Graphic Design AD work, which isn't something I would want permanently on my skin, so I agree with that sentiment expressed by people better versed than I. The whole stamped and/or type writer font wording on several of the examples posted by @Iwar leave me pretty cold.

BUT, the point about strong outlines made me think about Amanda Wachob, and I am curious what other people here think about her work in comparison and in contrast to work posted above.

Amanda-Wachob-4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Visually I like hers better but I wouldn't get a tattoo like that, same reasons as before pretty much. The first chicks arm does just look like some child painted on her, I'm sure that was the idea though. I think it's stupid.

jayessebee and David Flores like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The first chicks arm does just look like some child painted on her, I'm sure that was the idea though.

My kids have always been big on drawing on themselves, I think like most kids. Unlike most parents, we don't tell them no, or to stop. It was actually one of my son's preschool teachers that decided my son could color on himself in any fashion, saying that it was our "family culture." That being said, my two yr old daughter's "tattoos," as she calls them, rarely look as good, placement wise, as that first picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
doesn't look like a tattoo to me. not my thing.

correct. there's a certain celebration with some people about tattoos that don't look like tattoos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Visually I like hers better but I wouldn't get a tattoo like that, same reasons as before pretty much. The first chicks arm does just look like some child painted on her, I'm sure that was the idea though. I think it's stupid.

Oh, I don't know. Maybe Jackson Pollack minus, of course, the texture. They actually remind me a bit of a video I saw about bioluminescence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or this by Noon.

images2.jpgimages5.jpg

hearttattoo.jpgROODEEANDDOODDEE.jpg

images.jpg

I just don't get why would someone want this sort of thing tattooed on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ugh someone posted those noon photos in another thread... total shit. I think. The heart on the couple is one of the dumbest tattoos I've seen, ever. Just further proof that the general population has zero taste. At least on the last two the lines are clean, still ugly and look nothing like tattoos to me though.

Gregor, abees, Dan S and 1 other like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the original Trash Polka tattoos, I would not have one done on me and I agree that they seem faddy, but I certainly recognise and appreciate the technical ability required to execute them. They certainly look like tattoos to me, albeit clearly different to (and perhaps deliberately in contrast to) most mainstream tattooing. I guess there are so many dreadful tattooists doing technically very bad work, but that many would consider to be recognisably 'tattoos', that I find it hard to dismiss this work which is at least shows talent and application to the task. Not a popular opinion, I know.

Jaycel Adkins likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal problem with this stuff is that it doesn't deal with or derive from the basic motivations of humans or society.

All the long-lasting tattoo imagery addresses or springs from some basic element of humanity. Which is why they've lasted a long time.

My opinion is that this style of work (trash polka et al) is created with the main motivation to stand out from the crowd or be 'different'.

The drive to be original, different or special, is fundamentally flawed and certainly short-lived.

If tattoo designs derive from deep-rooted human drives and archetypes it's pretty much impossible for the concept to become dated. The execution is a different matter.

In my opinion all the best tattoo imagery comes from or symbolises basic human drives, or the needs of humans in society. Skulls, pin-ups, powerful animals, flowers, hearts, religious imagery, daggers etc, etc.

Most of the flash or portfolios (including tribal) in a decent tattoo shop will succinctly encompass the interesting bits of the human experience.

That's why the work posted in this thread rings hollow for me, regardless of the difficulty of the application.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@Valerie Vargas - it's new thing they added last week, you just put @ in front of anyone's name, but make sure you put the space between first and last name like yours and Stewart's!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
how did you do the @stewartrobson thing? that's cool!

@Valerie Vargas, you just did, but you missed the space in stewart's profile name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now