Jump to content

Petri Aspvik

Member
  • Posts

    537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Petri Aspvik

  1. I know that in 2012 it will be 2012 tattoos. I have been actually thinking that it would be cool to get I survived 2012 NOW, just to fuck with all the "doomsday" bastards. Because I base my prediction on logic, so its a shure bet."

    edit. Then again... There really isn't going to be anything to survive from. So maybe the idea needs little work.

    Maybe like a check list type thing with all the predicted doomsdays going on as far as they go. Maybe even make some dates up, then all of them crossed before hand and Carl Sagan slapping a face with a text such as "Carl Sagan - slapping bitches back to reality 1934 – 1996"

  2. Yeah, the Stuart leg sleeves are amazing. I want to strive to that outlook myself. This one by Scott Harrison is bad ass also. I dont really like Scott's stuff that much personally, but this owns! This tattoo and the one by Stuart look like Lungfish Feral Hymns album sounds. Images to sounds

    scott%20harrisison%20sleeve.jpg

    And btw. About the use of space around tattoos. Check out the Robert Ryan interview in TAM, he talks about that in there.

  3. Obviously the cool new things in 2011.

    Back to the discussion.. I really like the idea of making the tattoo alive yourself. Well said. But I wanted to come back to the idea that tattoos of an image having a "set visual meaning" -- because in the same way, so do, for example, polynesian designs. X, y and z could very easily and concretely mean "sea, turtle and warrior" to the culture in which it originated. It reminds me of what's happening with a lot of other symbols lately, of the esoteric variety. People slapping on numbers or planetary symbols or images associated with different sects or secret societies. Designs which are deeply routed in belief systems or schools of thought that are often very difficult to understand.

    So. More questions up for discussion. Do you think incorporating the use of tribal designs into new designs (or using straight traditional tribal designs) is a.) at all similar to that? And b.) as we create this new visual vocabulary, what do you think our responsibilities are, as far as both the tattooer and wearer are concerned?

    I think it cames down to can a group of people copyright (for lack of a better word) a meaning of a symbol? Or should we automatically asume that if we as westeners use a symbol/design that means something (animal, plant, god, idea) to some people - and has meant it for hundreds, maybe thousands of years- that the people who have first gotten it tattooed would be offended? Maybe they would be happy. Or couldn't care?

    I used to think that same aspect but I think it is a very westener type deal, how we are always concerned that if we use something differently than other people, then we would insult them. But I think it can also be a cool thing for them. Or not. Hard to say.

    If there is a something in these tattoo designs that resonates, or as you said

    Do you think the designs immediately spark something internal in us, as part of a collective unconscious, or do you think people just automatically associate them with something primal and primitive and therefore more significant?

    Then it could very well be that they who have gotten blackwork/tirbal tattoos longer than america or finland has been around, might see it as this also. They also could find it something that brings US closer to them. And not just them to us.

    So I think the responsibilites depend on the wearer. They should know that in some cases they might hurt some guy in New Zealand if they get a stylised moko tattooed. But also the people who want to raise concern about that the New Zealander might get hurt, should also consider the fact that they might think it is cool to them.

×
×
  • Create New...