PhilB 1 Posted January 4, 2013 Teenager left with Marilyn Monroe design 'like a blow up sex doll' after £50 session | Mail Online Reader's Digest version: Dumb teen goes to guy for cheap tattoo. Surprisingly, guy who agrees to tattoo teenager for cheap sucks. Teen and her mom decide to expose guy after he reneged on refunding her money for monstrosity he created. Is this kind of publicity good or bad? I'm torn. On the one hand, it helps to educate people about scratchers. On the other hand, many people will assume that all tattoo artists are like this douchebag. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McCaul 0 Posted January 4, 2013 Yikes.... Really does look "blowupdoll-ish". Like you said, there are good and bad in this kind of publicity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johannes 5 Posted January 4, 2013 well the tattoos that guy is doing IS shit but then on the other hand...she's 16! she shouldn't be getting tattoos at all.... 2 Jack Wier and reverend1 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hogrider 1,659 Posted January 4, 2013 Act in haste, repent in leisure. Too bad she didn't spend as much time researching this scratcher as she is spending outing him. I hope he winds up in jail. She's already gotten her punishment. 2 ProvidenceTattoo and Shannon Shirley reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chasewheeler 3 Posted January 5, 2013 stupid is as stupid does, feel sorry for who you want but get real. that dude looked like an ass clown and she was dumb enough to get tattooed in his apartment. she should go to jail and get a better tattoo. 1 Tittleton reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jack 8 Posted January 5, 2013 you sure she's not 50 or from Williamsburg? 1 gougetheeyes reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gougetheeyes 234 Posted January 5, 2013 I'd love to be the kind of person who tells you to stop linking stories like this because you're just legitimizing bad tattooing and lending some sort of weird credence to Kitchen Wizards -- but I'm not and I laughed and it's still funny -- especially the tattoos towards the bottom. We all can't be Frenchies named Fuzi........ 2 Duffa and ChrisvK reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HaydenRose 62 Posted January 5, 2013 Wait... (And yell at me mods if I'm getting too into prices) ... She estimates it will cost her $300 to get it covered? Is she going to a more pricier scratcher? She probably won't even be able to get the tattoo she originally wanted, but a larger one to cover it. Also she's sixteen and a working hairdresser?! This whole thing makes me think its fake to make a "good" story... 1 gougetheeyes reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Delicious 15 Posted January 5, 2013 I think in Britain they can finish school and get a certificate for a profession at like 16... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shannon Shirley 6 Posted January 5, 2013 "EVERYONE GETS THE TATTOO THEY DESERVE".......H.Goldfield 3 ProvidenceTattoo, Reyeslv and Graeme reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xbox12 0 Posted January 6, 2013 allways go to someone that is smart and has there own shop sad man Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJDeepFried 511 Posted January 9, 2013 Think I'll pick up one a these bad boys for $35. Deal of the Day | A Sale a Day | Daily Deals at MidnightBox.com I've never tattooed before but how hard could it be? I'm pretty good at Draw Something. Anyone wanna come over? I'll do a kickass panther on ya for a six pack. Even wipe down the kitchen table for ya with some Windex. 2 TrixieFaux and spookysproul reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cork 645 Posted January 10, 2013 Probably the worst part of that whole article is the subtitle of the one pic which reads, "The estimated cost of a cover up will be 300 GBP." Which means she is probably going to go to another unskilled artist for a cover up with not enough skill to really do a cover up. Maybe I'm doing the wrong currency exchange in my head, but I would think a truly nice pinup of Monroe would cost more than that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just Alex 5 Posted February 4, 2013 yeah it's abysmal but at least there isn't a great deal to cover. I do find it odd that they talk about £300 as if it is a staggering amount of money for a tattoo. As we all know, it is small change when it comes to getting good work. In fairness to her she is only 16. I got my first when I was 18 and whilst its much better than hers it is still pretty awful. My cover up will cost much more than £300 though! I just wish I hadn't read the comments... the "all tattoos are hideous" brigade make me so mad! 1 else reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NickXEdge 0 Posted December 28, 2013 Maybe I'm cynical or an asshole or whatever, but not a single piece of me feels bad for people who go to scratchers and then complain about why they got a turd on them forever. Serves them right and they should live with their own mistakes and own up to that instead of trying to always find and place the blame somewhere else. That being said, however, I'm not at all going to promote a scratcher or kitchen wizard at all. There's no place in the world for any of that and I think it's good to get that guys name out there in the article so people will know who he is and to stay away from that. I can understand that a lot of tattooers (and good tattooers at that) started out tattooing their friends/neighbors/enemies/anybody the same way, but they've actually taken the time to get to know the industry and get into shops and LEARN. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan 2,434 Posted December 29, 2013 she does'nt look 16 IMO, and that tattoo is so bad,it does'nt seem real. was it done freehand or was it stenciled on and she approved it ? LOL (these are just my random thoughts) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Colored Guy 351 Posted December 29, 2013 she does'nt look 16 IMO,and that tattoo is so bad,it does'nt seem real. was it done freehand or was it stenciled on and she approved it ? LOL (these are just my random thoughts) Some people are not hip to tattoo protocol, the process, what to expect, how to check out a shop, etc. Some lessons in life just cost more than others. Fortunately for shit work, they are easier to cover up. Rob 2 Reyeslv and Dan reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spookysproul 9 Posted December 29, 2013 she does'nt look 16 IMO,and that tattoo is so bad,it does'nt seem real. was it done freehand or was it stenciled on and she approved it ? LOL (these are just my random thoughts) I've been talking about this a lot recently. How are SO many people who clearly have NO concept of the mechanics of drawing, composition, or even basic familiarity with art in general picking up "tat guns" and thinking "Yeah, I should give this a shot"?? 2 Abellve and Dan reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
temporarytattoo 0 Posted May 6, 2014 I think you should change the tattoo design that would be looking good. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
